|
OPINION
INTERNET RADIO IN JEOPARDY
Posted on saveinternetradio.org
You can help
By
Greg Forest on Thursday, June 27, 2002 - 01:45 pm:
The RIAA
is trying to hang on to a monopoly. THEY are the only entity
entitled to screw recording artists out of money. We saw this
coming years ago. Down sample Hillary Rosen about 3 semitones
and she sounds an awful lot like Ken Lay.
The RIAA claims that the internet royalty will be paid to them
and then the money will travel from there to the artist. Bull.
I seriously doubt that the RIAA is going to pay one dollar to
any artist who is not on an RIAA affiliate label. If indeed
the RIAA IS going to pay royalties to non-member labels, it is
their Achilles heel. It would only take a couple days to
create an accounting nightmare for them. They may have trouble
FINDING the garage label that they owe money to - much less
the artist.
As a writer/producer I think it would be great to sue the RIAA
for the big bucks that they would owe me from say... five
downloads.
"RIAA - you guys owe me royalties in the amount of
$0.0684! You better pay up now! The cost of postage to mail
your royalty check would far outweigh the royalties collected
by RIAA. Like they are going to do that?
They will do the same thing to recording artists that happens
to songwriters on radio - if you don't generate enough airplay
to show up on THEIR sweeps (based on THEIR demographics/THEIR
chosen stations and markets) or on national charts, you don't
exist. I know plenty of artists who get airplay and never see
a dime. Why? Because they don't get ENOUGH airplay. You are
only compensated by the majors for being totally successful -
not partially successful.
I would hazard a guess that what is really happening here -
where the corporate Labelmasters really want to go with this
is that in the near future, only RIAA members will have the
right to broadcast music on the internet. I've had a record
label since 1969 and have never nor will ever be a member of
the RIAA. They do absolutely nothing for the artists except
bend them over. Perhaps at one time they were the voice of a
larger segment of the music industry (when indie labels were
flourishing) but now they are here to protect the rights of
the majors in their quest to turn musical art into a corporate
commodity owned by them exclusively and in perpetuity.
Any indie label who is a member is a turncoat or coward - in
essence abetting the enemy of music as an art form rather than
commodity.
We need alternative music business models much more than
alternative music.
The bottom line to create change is in the power of the
consumer dollar. As long as blow up music dolls like Brittany
and N-Sync rule the charts, the RIAA will have a huge war
chest to use for lobbying Congress (we used to call it payola
- except now instead of paying the DJ you pay your elected
officials). As long as the RIAA wants to act like some musical
Gestapo, I can see why "ripping" is so popular.
Do I support music piracy? Absolutely not. Musicians and
writers need to be compensated fairly. It is my premise that
the majors aren't doing this. You are MUCH better off
financially selling 20,000 units off your website than selling
ten times that amount via your major label.
If you want to be famous - you will have to play with RIAA
types, put a ring in your belly, get a troupe of backup
dancers (used to be singers) and start doing the dancing bear
routine - and die broke.
If you want to make money, and have enough talent to sell
regionally - YOU DON'T NEED THEM. Even if you DON'T have
talent, don't give up - remember that the majors pick 9 losers
out of every ten acts they sign - the next could be you!
Again the bottom line - since Napster, ripping and the
Internet, the profits of the major labels have gone nowhere
but up. They claim they have to screw artists so that they can
make a profit. They will tell you that 9 of 10 bands they sign
don't make money. Why? Because they wouldn't know good music
if they heard it. And WE have to pay for their A&R
departments only getting it right less than 10% of the time.
The Internet is booming and so are their profits. Even if they
were losing money - why is that MY fault? All artists on an
RIAA label foot the costs of their failures - even the
winners. Ask some of the platinum selling artists that have
been filling stadiums for years and still OWE THEIR LABELS
MONEY.
As long as art is a commodity, there will be issues like this.
We are a record label. It is our job to exploit the talent of
our artists. And exploit we do - we pay ANY artist on our
label at least three times the per unit royalty paid to
Madonna announced by her label. We pay from the first unit
sold with no recoupment clause. We only license the recordings
for no more than 25 years when the masters and all rights in
them revert to the artist. We make money. Why? We have none of
the costly infrastructure that the majors need to hold up
their regime. Our products are not in Wal-Mart. Who do we
answer to? The artists and their buying fans - not
shareholders.
If RIAA
members had any sense they would be the ones putting up the
MP3s and driving sales to their websites with the added value
that a brick and mortar CD has over a sonically inferior MP3.
The demographics collected in user registrations alone would
be well worth the price of letting folks download a file.
Instead of using the technology - again they fight it.
The RIAA cries wolf with every new widget that allows
consumers power over their entertainment experience. Some of
us are old enough to remember how cassettes ruined record
sales and destroyed the industry.
Write
your Congressman and Senators about this issue if you want
but until you include a huge check to help with their next
campaign, you will get a form letter thanking you for your
concern and be assured your elected officials are watching the
issue closely. Bull.
We are living in the time of the global corporate takeover -
we voted it in - we deserve what we get.
Alternative music? How about alternative Congress.
To all the unknown musicians, writers, producers and
programmers trying to use the Internet as an outlet, like the
gladiators saluting, - we at The Music Office salute you. Hang
in there.
-Greg Forest, The Music Office *
* Trying
to appear literate, I fixed a few typos from the original post.
|